Interessante esse trecho, que confirma o que já ressaltei aqui algumas vezes. E o trecho vai além: os calibres 1000 foram fundamentais para a perda de credibilidade no Constellation, que há décadas era visto como a epítome do Cronômetro.During the development of this new family in 1967/68 there were no bigger players than Omega and Rolex in theproduction watch genre (assembly-line manufacture of movements and accoutrements). They were second tieronly to the haute hologerie establishments. Sales figures and statistics on chronometer certification support theCalibre 1021 COSC certified day/date movement contention that the Constellation was regarded by the watch buying public as the better choice of chronometer.The price of Omega Constellations in the 1960s was respectably higher than Rolex chronometers of a similar ilk.It is testament to Rolex’s marketing skills that, today, comparable quality Omega production watches sell formuch less than Rolex production watches.The point being laboured above is that because of technical and commercial issues Omega fell as the mighty fall,and it was a very long drop. The introduction of the base calibre 1010 did little, seemingly, to ameliorate thelonger-term damage to the model’s reputation. As the old marketing adage goes, it’s far, far easier to losecustomers than to get them back again. The same applies to brand or model reputation.
Segue o texto sobre os calibres 10xx que envolvem os constellations, devilles e outros....http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec/Movement4.pdf
Eu me desfiz dos que tinha com máquinas da família 1000.
Davam dor de cabeça? O meu está precisando de uma revisão completa....Enviado de meu Moto G (5) usando Tapatalk
Não! É que os que eu tinha eram day-date. Não gosto.Enviado de meu SM-G570M usando Tapatalk
Ah sim. Você fala tanto dos day-date que estou começando a fugir deles kkkkkkkEnviado de meu Moto G (5) usando Tapatalk